More Videos
- USA Basketball Team Photo: Artistic Or Logo "Conspiracy"?
- Steve And Barry's, Bankruptcy And "Sampsonite” T-shirts
- Nike “Air McFlys” Finally Hit Store Shelves
- Vin Baker Joins List Of Athlete Home Foreclosures
- Sponsors: Should They Get Money Back If Athlete Is A No Show?
- Getting Schooled By Kobe
- AFL's Philadelphia Soul: Offering The Best Sports Promotion Ever?
- Zell's Dilemma: Sell Cubs Now Or After (Maybe) Winning It All?
- The Sports Biz Blog Jinx Hits NBA Draft
- Latest Tiger Apple Update: The Saga Continues
- EU Opens Probe in BHP Billiton Bid for Rio Tinto
- Worse Car Sales Decline Expected in Western Europe
- Euro Banks Need to Raise $90-$140 Billion: Goldman
- BSkyB Mulls $4 Billion Bid for Spain's Digital Plus: FT
- On the Bright Side, Shopping Bargains Abound
- Euro Stocks Fall as Goldman Note Hits Banks
- Return of Asian Currency Crisis Is Unlikely: ADB
- European Shares Set to Open Flat as Holiday Shuts US
- Airbus to Sell Five A380s to Japan's ANA: Nikkei
 |
AP |
Here is the most important question. How much more or less likely are you to buy a product or service from a company because it is a sponsor of this year's Summer Olympics in Beijing?
12 Percent More Likely
26 Percent Less Likely
62 Percent No Impact
While 26 percent seems like a small percentage, it's huge in this case. This basically says that for every person that says that the Olympic sponsorship means something in a positive way towards a purchase, there are two people who will purposely stay away from that product because of the association with China and the perception of their human rights issues.
You think all the big sponsors paid tens of millions of dollars for that?
While I don't doubt that the answer here is representative of the general population, and that it’s amazing that buying a sponsorship could actually hurt you, it's still skewed in the overall scheme of things.
More posts |
The fact is that these multi-national companies are worth billions of dollars and there are many other factors that drive purchasing decisions.
So, for example, the low price of a burger a McDonald's [MCD
Loading...
()
] --a TOP Olympic sponsor--could allow a person who answered "Less Likely" in the above question to still show up and make a purchase.
You see, while it’s a good question and it’s worth asking, it can’t be viewed in a vacuum. Visa, an Olympic sponsor, just saw profit go up 28 percent.
Sponsor Johnson & Johnson’s [JNJ
Loading...
()
] profits were benefited partly by a weak dollar. Manulife Financial [MFC
Loading...
()
] , also a sponsor, had a weak quarter but that was about declining equity markets.
I’ll also say that I suspect that if you asked that question in China, you’d likely get a more positive response on the sponsors, even though Maslansky says that data he has seen doesn’t reflect that.
Pulling out of the Olympics as a sponsor would kill that company’s efforts in China forever because China can and will control the ability of a company to do business there. And I suspect that all these companies have looked at the numbers and have found that, in the long run, it’s still better to be an Olympic sponsor than not.
Questions? Comments?
Del.icio.us
Digg It
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes